Category Archives: M. Ed.

M. Ed. Videos

Approaches of Assessment, Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., M. Ed.

Open Book System

6 Comments

Open book system refers to an assessment method in which students are allowed to use their textbooks, notes, and other study materials during an exam. This type of assessment is different from traditional closed-book exams, where students are not allowed to refer to any materials during the exam.

In an open book system, students are expected to have a better understanding of the material and be able to apply critical thinking skills to solve problems. They are also expected to be able to use their textbooks and notes to support their answers and provide evidence for their reasoning.

Some of the advantages of the open book system include:

  1. Encourages deeper learning: Since students are allowed to use their study materials, the open book system encourages them to read and understand the material in depth, as they will need to apply their knowledge to solve problems.
  2. Fosters critical thinking skills: It may requires students to analyze and interpret information, apply concepts, and draw conclusions, which fosters critical thinking skills.
  3. Reduces stress and anxiety: Students may feel less stressed and anxious during an open book exam as they have access to their study materials.
  4. Provides more accurate assessment: It may provide a more accurate assessment of a student’s knowledge and skills as they are required to apply their knowledge and skills to solve problems.

However, the open book system also has some disadvantages, such as:

  1. Requires time management skills: Students must manage their time effectively during an open book exam, as they may have more material to review than in a closed-book exam.
  2. May reduce the importance of memorization: Since students are allowed to use their study materials, they may not place as much importance on memorization, which may affect their long-term retention of the material.
  3. Can lead to cheating: It may lead to cheating, as students may be tempted to collaborate with others or use unauthorized resources during the exam.
  4. May not be suitable for all subjects: It may not be suitable for subjects that require memorization, such as language learning or mathematics, where the ability to recall information is essential.

Also Read : Difference between Measurement and Evaluation

Open Book System
Open Book System

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Approaches of Assessment, Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., M. Ed.

Semester System

5 Comments

The semester system is an academic calendar system that divides the academic year into two or three semesters, each of which typically lasts for 15-18 weeks. Here are some of the merits and demerits of the semester system:

Merits:

  1. Flexibility: The semester system provides greater flexibility for students in terms of course scheduling, allowing them to take a wider variety of courses and complete their degree requirements at their own pace.
  2. Continuous Assessment: The semester system provides regular opportunities for students to be assessed and evaluated through mid-term and end-of-semester exams, quizzes, and assignments. This helps to monitor student progress and provide timely feedback, which can be beneficial for students’ learning.
  3. Opportunities for Improvement: With regular assessments, students who don’t perform well in one semester have another opportunity to improve in the next semester, and the overall grades are averaged to calculate the final grade.
  4. Improved Faculty-Student Interaction: The semester system allows for more frequent interactions between students and faculty, which can lead to better communication and understanding.
  5. Improved Learning Outcomes: With regular assessments, students are more motivated to keep up with their studies and can be more actively engaged in their learning.

Demerits:

  1. High-stress levels: The semester system may increase the stress levels among students, due to the pressure of regular exams, deadlines and workload.
  2. Difficulties with transferring credits: Transferring credits between universities with different semester systems can be challenging, as the course content and duration may differ.
  3. Limited time for deep learning: With shorter semesters, students may not have sufficient time to fully understand and absorb complex concepts or to engage in deep learning.
  4. Limited opportunities for remedial classes: With limited time and a packed curriculum, there may be limited opportunities for students to attend remedial classes, which can be disadvantageous for students who struggle with certain subjects.
  5. Difficulty in coordinating courses: Due to the number of courses offered, coordinating between different departments and courses can be challenging.

Also Read : Difference between Measurement and Evaluation

Semester System

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
IV Educational Management, Administration and Leadership(Secondary Level), M. Ed., NET, Paper 2, Unit 9 Educational Management, Administration and Leadership

Principles of Educational Management

10 Comments

Education management refers to the process of planning, organizing, directing, and controlling the activities of an educational institution. Effective education management is essential for ensuring that students receive a high-quality education that meets their needs and prepares them for success in the future.

Henry Fayol’s 14 principles of management are general principles that he believed could be applied to any type of organization, including educational institutions.

Principles of Education Management:

  1. Division of work: This principle suggests that tasks should be divided among staff members in a way that allows each person to focus on their area of expertise. In education management, this could involve assigning specific responsibilities to teachers and staff members based on their qualifications and expertise.
  2. Authority and responsibility: Fayol believed that authority and responsibility should be clearly defined and understood by everyone in the organization. In education management, this could involve ensuring that administrators, teachers, and staff members understand their roles and responsibilities.
  3. Discipline: This principle suggests that there should be clear rules and consequences in place to ensure that everyone in the organization follows policies and procedures. In education management, this could involve establishing a code of conduct for students and staff members.
  4. Unity of command: This principle suggests that employees should have only one supervisor to whom they are accountable. In education management, this could involve ensuring that teachers and staff members report to a single administrator.
  5. Unity of direction: This principle suggests that everyone in the organization should be working towards the same goals and objectives. In education management, this could involve ensuring that all staff members are aligned with the educational institution’s mission and vision.
  6. Subordination of individual interests to the common good: This principle suggests that the interests of the organization should take priority over the interests of individuals. In education management, this could involve ensuring that staff members prioritize the needs of students and the educational institution over their own personal interests.
  7. Remuneration: This principle suggests that employees should be fairly compensated for their work. In education management, this could involve ensuring that teachers and staff members receive fair salaries and benefits.
  8. Centralization: This principle suggests that decision-making should be centralized in the hands of a few top-level managers. In education management, this could involve ensuring that important decisions about curriculum, resources, and policies are made by a small group of administrators.
  9. Scalar chain: This principle suggests that there should be a clear chain of command and communication from the top of the organization to the bottom. In education management, this could involve ensuring that information and decisions flow smoothly from administrators to teachers and staff members.
  10. Order: This principle suggests that there should be a place for everything and everything should be in its place. This could involve ensuring that resources, equipment, and supplies are organized and stored in a way that is efficient and easy to access.
  11. Equity: Fayol believed that employees should be treated fairly and equitably. This could involve ensuring that students and staff members are treated fairly and equitably regardless of their background or circumstances.
  12. Stability of tenure: This principle suggests that employees should be given job security and opportunities for long-term career growth. This could involve ensuring that teachers and staff members are provided with opportunities for professional development and career advancement.
  13. Initiative: This principle suggests that employees should be encouraged to take initiative and contribute new ideas to the organization. In education management, this could involve encouraging teachers and staff members to develop new educational programs or teaching strategies.
  14. Esprit de corps: This principle suggests that there should be a sense of unity and teamwork among employees. In education management, this could involve promoting a positive and collaborative culture among teachers, staff members, and students.

Overall, Fayol’s principles of management can be applied to education management to help ensure that educational institutions are well-managed and effective in achieving their goals.

Also Read : Educational Research

Principles of Educational Management

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Curriculum Studies, M. Ed.

Role of Teacher as Curriculum Maker

10 Comments

Teachers play an important role as curriculum makers because they are the ones who are most directly involved in delivering instruction to students. Role of teacher as curriculum maker is very important and necessary.

They have a unique perspective on the needs and interests of their students, as well as their strengths and weaknesses, and can use this knowledge to shape the curriculum in a way that is most effective for their particular classroom.

Some of the ways in which teachers can contribute to curriculum development include:

  1. Identifying learning objectives: Teachers can help identify the key learning objectives that need to be covered in a particular subject area or course. They can use their knowledge and experience to determine the most important concepts and skills that students need to master.
  2. Designing lesson plans: Teachers can design detailed lesson plans that outline the specific activities and assessments that will be used to help students achieve the learning objectives. These plans can be tailored to the needs and interests of individual students, and can be adjusted as needed based on ongoing assessment and feedback.
  3. Selecting instructional materials: Teachers can help select instructional materials, such as textbooks, videos, and other resources, that are aligned with the curriculum and will help students achieve the learning objectives. They can also provide input on the design and development of these materials to ensure that they are effective and engaging.
  4. Assessing student learning: Teachers can create and administer assessments that measure student progress towards the learning objectives. They can use this data to make informed decisions about how to adjust the curriculum and instructional practices to better meet the needs of their students.
  5. Providing feedback: Teachers can provide feedback to curriculum developers about what is working well and what needs improvement in the curriculum. This can help ensure that the curriculum is effective and responsive to the needs of students and teachers alike.

Overall, teachers have a critical role to play in curriculum development because they are the ones who are most intimately familiar with the needs and interests of their students. By contributing their expertise and insights, teachers can help create a curriculum that is engaging, effective, and tailored to the needs of their particular classroom.

Also Read : Hidden Curriculum

Role of Teacher as curriculum maker
Role of Teacher as Curriculum Maker

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Curriculum Studies, M. Ed.

Spiral Curriculum

4 Comments

The Spiral Curriculum is a teaching approach that emphasizes revisiting and building upon previously learned concepts over time. It was developed by Jerome Bruner, a psychologist and educator, in the 1960s.

The idea behind the Spiral Curriculum is that learning should be a continuous, interconnected process. Instead of teaching new concepts in isolation, the Spiral Curriculum emphasizes revisiting and building upon previously learned material, allowing students to deepen their understanding and develop a more sophisticated grasp of the material.

In the Spiral Curriculum, students are first introduced to a basic concept, which is then revisited and built upon in subsequent lessons. Each time the concept is revisited, it is presented in a more complex or nuanced way, allowing students to deepen their understanding and develop a more sophisticated grasp of the material.

This approach is often contrasted with the traditional linear curriculum, in which new concepts are introduced one at a time and each topic is taught in isolation from the others. The Spiral Curriculum is intended to help students make connections between different subjects and develop a more holistic understanding of the material.

Here are some key characteristics of the Spiral Curriculum:

  1. Emphasis on foundational knowledge: It begins with foundational knowledge or basic concepts. These concepts are then revisited and built upon in subsequent lessons, allowing students to develop a deeper understanding of the material.
  2. Building complexity: Each time a concept is revisited, it is presented in a more complex or nuanced way. This allows students to develop a deeper and more sophisticated understanding of the material.
  3. Interdisciplinary connections: It emphasizes connections between different subjects. By revisiting previously learned material, students can make connections between different subjects and develop a more holistic understanding of the material.
  4. Active learning: It emphasizes active learning, such as problem-solving and critical thinking. Instead of just memorizing facts, students are encouraged to engage with the material and think critically about it.
  5. Lifelong learning: It is designed to help students develop a deep and lasting understanding of the material. By emphasizing foundational knowledge, building complexity, and interdisciplinary connections, the Spiral Curriculum helps students develop the skills and knowledge they need to continue learning throughout their lives.

Overall, the Spiral Curriculum is a teaching approach that emphasizes building upon previously learned material over time. By revisiting and deepening their understanding of foundational knowledge, students can develop a more sophisticated understanding of the material and the skills they need for lifelong learning.

Also Read : Eclectic model of Curriculum Design

Spiral Curriculum
Spiral Curriculum

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!