Category Archives: Issues, Curriculum and Assessment (secondary Level)

Approaches of Assessment, Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., Issues, Curriculum and Assessment (secondary Level), M. Ed., NET, Paper 2, Pedagogy of English, Unit 7 Pedagogy, Andragogy and Assessment

Types of Evaluation

3 Comments

Evaluation is the process of assessing or measuring the effectiveness, impact, or value of something, such as a program, project, product, or service. There are many types of Evaluation method. It involves collecting and analyzing data to determine whether the goals and objectives of the thing being evaluated have been achieved, and to identify strengths and weaknesses in the implementation.

Here are more details about the three types of evaluation:

  1. Formative Evaluation: It is a type of evaluation that is conducted during the development and implementation of a program or project. Its purpose is to assess progress and identify areas for improvement. It involves ongoing feedback and monitoring to ensure that the program is on track to meet its goals. It can be used to identify strengths and weaknesses in a program, to assess the quality of the program’s implementation, and to make adjustments to the program to ensure its success. This type of evaluation is usually qualitative and can involve surveys, interviews, and focus groups.
  2. Diagnostic Evaluation: Diagnostic evaluation is used to identify the root cause of a problem or issue. It is used to determine why a program is not working as intended and what changes need to be made to improve its effectiveness. Diagnostic evaluation involves collecting data on the problem or issue, analyzing the data, and making recommendations for improvement. This type of evaluation is usually qualitative and can involve surveys, interviews, and focus groups.
  3. Summative Evaluation: It is a type of evaluation that is conducted at the end of a program or project to measure its overall impact and effectiveness. Its purpose is to determine whether the program achieved its goals and objectives. It involves collecting data on the outcomes of the program, analyzing the data, and making conclusions about the program’s success or failure. This type of evaluation is usually quantitative and can involve surveys, tests, and other standardized assessments.

Also Read : Socio Metric Technique

Types of Evaluation

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
B. Ed., Issues, Curriculum and Assessment (secondary Level), Knowledge & Curriculum, M. Ed.

Tyler Model of Curriculum Development

4 Comments

The Tyler model of curriculum development, also known as the objectives model, was developed by Ralph Tyler in 1949. It is a systematic and linear approach to curriculum development that focuses on four fundamental questions:

  1. What educational purposes should the school seek to attain?
  2. What educational experiences can be provided that are likely to attain these purposes?
  3. How can these educational experiences be effectively organized?
  4. How can we determine whether these purposes are being attained?

The Tyler model involves a step-by-step process of curriculum development that begins with defining the objectives of the curriculum, identifying appropriate learning experiences, organizing these experiences into a logical sequence, and assessing the effectiveness of the curriculum in achieving its objectives.

The four stages of the Tyler model are:

  1. Defining objectives: The first stage involves identifying the educational objectives or goals that the curriculum is intended to achieve. Objectives should be specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound.
  2. Selecting content: The second stage involves identifying the content and learning experiences that will help students achieve the objectives identified in the first stage. The content should be relevant, meaningful, and appropriate for the intended audience.
  3. Organizing content: The third stage involves organizing the content and learning experiences into a logical sequence that facilitates learning. This may involve developing a scope and sequence, creating lesson plans, and designing assessments.
  4. Evaluating outcomes: The final stage involves evaluating the effectiveness of the curriculum in achieving its objectives. This may involve assessing student learning, evaluating the effectiveness of the teaching strategies and materials used, and making any necessary revisions to the curriculum.

The Tyler model of curriculum development is a widely used approach in education and is known for its focus on clearly defined objectives, alignment with learning standards, and systematic approach to curriculum development.

Also Visit : Grass Root Model

Tyler Model of Curriculum Development

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Issues, Curriculum and Assessment (secondary Level), M. Ed.

Demonstration Model of Curriculum Development

Leave a comment

The demonstration model of curriculum development refers to a teaching approach that focuses on hands-on learning and active participation by students.

This model emphasizes the use of demonstrations, experiments, and other interactive activities to help students understand and apply concepts.

In the demonstration model of curriculum, teachers are facilitators of learning, guiding students through the process of discovery and exploration. Students are encouraged to ask questions, make observations, and draw conclusions based on their experiences. This approach emphasizes the development of critical thinking skills and the ability to apply knowledge to real-world situations.

Features of Demonstration Model of Curriculum

The demonstration model of curriculum is a student-centered teaching approach that focuses on active learning and the use of demonstrations, experiments, and other interactive activities to facilitate learning. Some of the key features of the demonstration model of curriculum include:

  1. Hands-on learning: The demonstration model of curriculum emphasizes hands-on learning, where students actively participate in the learning process by conducting experiments, making observations, and analyzing data.
  2. Active participation: This model promotes active participation by students, who are encouraged to ask questions, make predictions, and draw conclusions based on their experiences.
  3. Use of technology: It often utilizes technology to enhance the learning experience, such as interactive whiteboards, online simulations, and virtual labs.
  4. Collaborative learning: This model encourages collaborative learning, where students work together in groups to share ideas, solve problems, and support one another.
  5. Real-world applications: The demonstration model of curriculum emphasizes the practical application of concepts, helping students understand how what they learn in the classroom applies to real-world situations.
  6. Development of critical thinking skills: By engaging students in active learning and encouraging them to draw conclusions based on their experiences, the demonstration model of curriculum helps develop critical thinking skills.
  7. Flexibility: The demonstration model of curriculum is flexible, allowing teachers to adapt their approach based on the needs and abilities of their students.

This model can be used in a variety of subject areas, from science and math to social studies and language arts. It is particularly effective in subjects that require hands-on experimentation, such as chemistry or biology.

Overall, the demonstration model of curriculum is a valuable tool for educators who want to create an engaging and effective learning environment that promotes student learning and achievement.

Also Read : Vocational Training Model of Curriculum

Also Read : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., Issues, Curriculum and Assessment (secondary Level), M. Ed.

Socio-metric Technique

3 Comments

The sociometric technique is a research method used to measure social relationships and the structure of social networks. It was developed by psychologist Jacob Moreno in the early 20th century and is often used in sociology, psychology, and organizational behavior studies.

The technique involves collecting data on social interactions and relationships within a group or organization. Participants are asked to identify their social ties, such as friends, acquaintances, and colleagues, and to rate the strength and quality of those relationships. This information is then analyzed to create a map or diagram of the social network, showing the connections and relationships between individuals.

Sociometric techniques can be used to explore a variety of research questions, including the dynamics of group communication, the formation and maintenance of social norms, and the impact of social influence on individual behavior. It is often used in organizational settings to assess employee morale, team dynamics, and communication patterns.

Also Read: Attitude Scale

Overall, the sociometric technique provides a valuable tool for understanding social relationships and networks and can help researchers and practitioners identify opportunities to improve group dynamics and communication.

Sociometric techniques have a wide range of uses in different fields, including:

  1. Identifying social structures: Sociometric techniques can be used to identify social structures within a group or organization, such as cliques, subgroups, or informal networks.
  2. Measuring group cohesion: Sociometric techniques can be used to measure the level of group cohesion, including the strength and quality of social ties between individuals in the group.
  3. Understanding communication patterns: Sociometric techniques can help researchers understand the communication patterns within a group, including who communicates with whom and how information flows within the group.
  4. Assessing individual influence: Sociometric techniques can be used to assess the level of individual influence within a group, including who has the most connections and who is most central to the group’s social structure.
  5. Improving group dynamics: Sociometric techniques can be used to identify potential problems within a group, such as communication breakdowns or low morale, and to develop interventions to improve group dynamics.
  6. Evaluating organizational effectiveness: Sociometric techniques can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of an organization or team by measuring the quality of social relationships and communication patterns.
Socio- Metric Technique
Also Visit: Prep with Harshita
BUY ME A BOOK!
Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., Issues, Curriculum and Assessment (secondary Level), M. Ed.

Attitude Scale

2 Comments

An attitude scale is a measurement tool used in psychology and social sciences to assess an individual’s attitude toward a particular object, concept, or event. Attitudes refer to the positive or negative evaluations, feelings, or beliefs that individuals hold towards an object or issue. Attitude scales typically consist of a series of statements or questions that measure the strength and direction of an individual’s attitude toward a particular subject.

There are different types of attitude scales, such as Likert scales, semantic differential scales, and Thurstone scales. Likert scales are the most commonly used type of attitude scale, and they ask respondents to rate their level of agreement or disagreement with a series of statements on a numeric scale, usually ranging from 1 to 5 or 1 to 7.

Attitude scales are widely used in research studies to measure people’s attitudes toward a variety of subjects, including political issues, social problems, health behaviors, and consumer products. The data collected from attitude scales can provide valuable insights into people’s beliefs, perceptions, and intentions, and can be used to develop effective interventions or communication strategies.

Also Visit: Prep with Harshita

There are several benefits of using attitude scales to measure individuals’ attitudes toward specific objects or issues:

  1. Standardization: Attitude scales provide standardized measures that allow researchers to compare attitudes across different groups of people and over time.
  2. Accuracy: Attitude scales provide a more accurate and reliable measurement of attitudes compared to other methods such as interviews or observations.
  3. Precision: Attitude scales can capture even subtle differences in attitudes that might be missed through other means of measurement.
  4. Objectivity: Attitude scales are less prone to subjective interpretation by researchers, which can lead to more objective and unbiased data.
  5. Efficiency: Attitude scales are a quick and efficient way to gather data from large numbers of participants.
  6. Predictive power: Attitude scales can be used to predict behavior, as attitudes are often a good predictor of future behavior.

Overall, attitude scales are a useful tool for researchers to better understand individuals’ attitudes towards different objects or issues and to gain insights into potential behaviors or decision-making processes.

Attitude Scale
Also Read: Rating Scale
BUY ME A BOOK!