Tag Archives: Advance curriculum theory

Advance Curriculum theory ( Secondary level)

Major characteristics of Curriculum Theory- Conceptual Structure

7 Comments

The conceptual structure of curriculum theory includes the following major characteristics:

  1. Curriculum as a social construct: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a socially constructed structure that is shaped by the values, beliefs, and relations of society. It recognizes that curriculum is not a neutral organization or structure but is influenced by social and cultural contexts.
  2. Curriculum as a process: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a dynamic and ongoing process that involves the design, implementation, and evaluation of educational programs. It recognizes that curriculum is not a fixed entity but is constantly evolving and changing in response to new knowledge, social and cultural changes, and educational policies.
  3. Curriculum as a context for learning: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a context for learning, in which learners engage in meaningful and purposeful activities that promote their intellectual, social, and emotional development. It recognizes that curriculum is not just a collection of knowledge and skills but is a means for promoting the holistic development of learners.
  4. Curriculum as a tool for social change: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a tool for social change, in which educators can use the curriculum to promote social justice, equity, and democracy. It recognizes that curriculum can be used to challenge social inequalities and to promote the empowerment of learners.
  5. Curriculum as a reflection of values and beliefs: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a reflection of the values and beliefs that underlie education. It recognizes that curriculum is not value-free but is shaped by the beliefs and values of educators, learners, and society.
Major Characteristics of Curriculum Theory- Conceptual Structure
BUY ME A BOOK!
Advance Curriculum theory ( Secondary level)

Major Characteristics of Curriculum Theory- Logic Structure

27 Comments

Curriculum theory has a logical structure that includes the following major characteristics:

  1. Ontology: Curriculum theory is concerned with understanding the nature of the curriculum, including its purpose, meaning, and existence. It tries to understand the questions such as “What is the curriculum?” and “What should be the goals of education?”
  2. Epistemology: Curriculum theory is concerned with the ways in which knowledge is acquired, organized, and transmitted through the curriculum. It explores questions such as “What are the different ways in which knowledge can be organized?”
  3. Axiology: Curriculum theory is concerned with the values and beliefs which are the curriculum. It explores questions such as “What values should be promoted through the curriculum?”
  4. Methodology: Curriculum theory is concerned with the methods and processes used to design, implement, and evaluate curriculum. It explores questions such as “What are the different approaches to curriculum design?”
  5. Pragmatics: Curriculum theory is concerned with the practical implications of curriculum, including how it is implemented in educational settings and how it affects learners. It explores questions such as “How can curriculum be adapted to meet the needs of diverse learners?”

Logic Structure of Curriculum Theory
BUY ME A BOOK!
Advance Curriculum theory ( Secondary level)

The Implication of Piaget’s and Bruner’s Views on Curriculum Development

13 Comments

Both Piaget and Bruner made significant contributions to the field of education and their views have implications for curriculum development.

Piaget’s theory of cognitive development suggests that children construct knowledge through their experiences and that this construction of knowledge is an active process. Piaget argued that children go through four stages of development and that the curriculum should be designed to meet the needs of children at each stage of development. For example, at the preoperational stage, children are not yet able to think logically, so the curriculum should be designed to help them learn through hands-on experiences and concrete examples.

Bruner’s theory of cognitive development focuses on the role of language and culture in shaping a child’s development. Bruner argued that children learn best when they are actively engaged in the learning process and that the curriculum should be designed to help children make connections between what they already know and what they are learning. Bruner also emphasized the importance of scaffolding, which involves providing children with support as they learn new concepts.

Both Piaget’s and Bruner’s views on curriculum development emphasize the importance of designing the curriculum to meet the needs of the child. Both theorists suggest that children should be active participants in the learning process and that the curriculum should be designed to help them construct knowledge through their experiences. In addition, both theorists emphasize the importance of providing children with support as they learn new concepts, whether through scaffolding or through hands-on experiences. Overall, the implications of their views on curriculum development emphasize the importance of creating a curriculum that is developmentally appropriate, engaging, and meaningful for children.

Also Read : Types of Evaluation

The implication of Piaget’s and Bruner’s Views on Curriculum Development

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Advance Curriculum theory ( Secondary level)

Need Assessment Model of Curriculum

10 Comments

The needs assessment model is a model that involves identifying the needs of learners and designing a curriculum that meets those needs. This model is a learner-centered approach to curriculum development, and it involves several key steps:

  1. Needs identification: This involves gathering information on the current situation and determining the gaps between the current situation and the desired situation. This can be done through various methods such as surveys, interviews, focus groups, and observations.
  2. Needs analysis: Once the needs have been identified, the next step is to analyze them in more detail. This involves examining the needs to determine their significance, urgency, and feasibility. This stage also involves analyzing the causes of the identified needs.
  3. Curriculum development: Once the needs have been identified and analyzed, the next step is to develop a curriculum that meets those needs. This involves creating learning objectives, selecting appropriate content and instructional methods, and determining the assessment strategies to evaluate student learning.
  4. Curriculum evaluation: The final stage of the needs assessment model of the curriculum involves evaluating the effectiveness of the curriculum. This is done through various methods such as testing, feedback from students and teachers, and observation. The evaluation results are then used to make necessary adjustments to the curriculum to improve its effectiveness.

Also Read : Demonstration Model

Need Assessment Model of Curriculum

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Advance Curriculum theory ( Secondary level), M. Ed., Uncategorized

Futuristic Model of Curriculum

7 Comments

A futuristic model of curriculum would aim to prepare students for the rapidly changing and modified world of the 21st century. This model would focus on the development of skills such as critical thinking, problem-solving, collaboration, communication, creativity, and adaptability, as these skills are essential for success in today’s workforce and society.

  1. The curriculum is designed is flexible and responsive to changes in technology, society, and the economy. It would be interdisciplinary and cross-cultural, incorporating multiple perspectives and encouraging students to think globally.
  2. The curriculum also focuses on lifelong learning, with a strong emphasis on the development of self-directed learning skills.
  3. The curriculum would incorporate practical, real-world experiences that enable students to apply their knowledge and skills to real-world problems. These experiences could include internships, community service projects, and entrepreneurship programs so that the students can be prepared for future and changing needs.
  4. Assessment in this futuristic model of curriculum would be diverse and multi-dimensional, including performance-based assessments, project-based assessments, and traditional tests. An assessment would also focus on the development of skills, rather than just content knowledge.
  5. The curriculum incorporates multiple perspectives and encourages students to think globally.
  6. The curriculum is designed to be flexible and responsive to changes in technology, society, and the economy.
  7. The curriculum prioritizes practical, real-world experiences that enable students to apply their knowledge and skills to real-world problems.
Also Read: Hilda Taba Model
Futuristic Curriculum Model
Also Visit: Prep with Harshita
BUY ME A BOOK!