Tag Archives: b ed notes

Approaches of Assessment, Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., M. Ed.

Open Book System

5 Comments

Open book system refers to an assessment method in which students are allowed to use their textbooks, notes, and other study materials during an exam. This type of assessment is different from traditional closed-book exams, where students are not allowed to refer to any materials during the exam.

In an open book system, students are expected to have a better understanding of the material and be able to apply critical thinking skills to solve problems. They are also expected to be able to use their textbooks and notes to support their answers and provide evidence for their reasoning.

Some of the advantages of the open book system include:

  1. Encourages deeper learning: Since students are allowed to use their study materials, the open book system encourages them to read and understand the material in depth, as they will need to apply their knowledge to solve problems.
  2. Fosters critical thinking skills: It may requires students to analyze and interpret information, apply concepts, and draw conclusions, which fosters critical thinking skills.
  3. Reduces stress and anxiety: Students may feel less stressed and anxious during an open book exam as they have access to their study materials.
  4. Provides more accurate assessment: It may provide a more accurate assessment of a student’s knowledge and skills as they are required to apply their knowledge and skills to solve problems.

However, the open book system also has some disadvantages, such as:

  1. Requires time management skills: Students must manage their time effectively during an open book exam, as they may have more material to review than in a closed-book exam.
  2. May reduce the importance of memorization: Since students are allowed to use their study materials, they may not place as much importance on memorization, which may affect their long-term retention of the material.
  3. Can lead to cheating: It may lead to cheating, as students may be tempted to collaborate with others or use unauthorized resources during the exam.
  4. May not be suitable for all subjects: It may not be suitable for subjects that require memorization, such as language learning or mathematics, where the ability to recall information is essential.

Also Read : Difference between Measurement and Evaluation

Open Book System
Open Book System

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Approaches of Assessment, Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., M. Ed.

Semester System

5 Comments

The semester system is an academic calendar system that divides the academic year into two or three semesters, each of which typically lasts for 15-18 weeks. Here are some of the merits and demerits of the semester system:

Merits:

  1. Flexibility: The semester system provides greater flexibility for students in terms of course scheduling, allowing them to take a wider variety of courses and complete their degree requirements at their own pace.
  2. Continuous Assessment: The semester system provides regular opportunities for students to be assessed and evaluated through mid-term and end-of-semester exams, quizzes, and assignments. This helps to monitor student progress and provide timely feedback, which can be beneficial for students’ learning.
  3. Opportunities for Improvement: With regular assessments, students who don’t perform well in one semester have another opportunity to improve in the next semester, and the overall grades are averaged to calculate the final grade.
  4. Improved Faculty-Student Interaction: The semester system allows for more frequent interactions between students and faculty, which can lead to better communication and understanding.
  5. Improved Learning Outcomes: With regular assessments, students are more motivated to keep up with their studies and can be more actively engaged in their learning.

Demerits:

  1. High-stress levels: The semester system may increase the stress levels among students, due to the pressure of regular exams, deadlines and workload.
  2. Difficulties with transferring credits: Transferring credits between universities with different semester systems can be challenging, as the course content and duration may differ.
  3. Limited time for deep learning: With shorter semesters, students may not have sufficient time to fully understand and absorb complex concepts or to engage in deep learning.
  4. Limited opportunities for remedial classes: With limited time and a packed curriculum, there may be limited opportunities for students to attend remedial classes, which can be disadvantageous for students who struggle with certain subjects.
  5. Difficulty in coordinating courses: Due to the number of courses offered, coordinating between different departments and courses can be challenging.

Also Read : Difference between Measurement and Evaluation

Semester System

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
B. Ed., Learning and teaching, NET, Paper 2, Unit 7 Pedagogy, Andragogy and Assessment

Herbartian Model of Memory level of Teaching

6 Comments

The Herbartian model of memory level of teaching does not explicitly address the concepts of Focus, Syntax, and Social System Support System. However, it does emphasize the importance of a supportive learning environment and the role of the teacher in facilitating learning.

Focus

The Herbartian model emphasizes on the development of the mental abilities of the learner. The importance of organizing and presenting new information in a clear and organized manner, using examples and illustrations to aid understanding. It also include cramming of facts along with training of mental aspects. This helps to ensure that students can retain the facts and concepts.

Syntax

In Herbart’s model, the process of teaching involves five steps: preparation, presentation, association, generalization, and application. These steps are designed to help students develop their powers of observation, memory, and reasoning.

The first step, preparation, involves getting students ready for learning by introducing the topic and establishing its relevance to their interests and prior knowledge. The second step, presentation, involves presenting the new information in a clear and organized manner, using examples and illustrations to aid understanding.

The third step, association, involves linking the new information to what the students already know, making connections between ideas and concepts. The fourth step, generalization, involves drawing out general principles and concepts from the specific information presented.

The final step, application, involves applying the new knowledge to real-life situations, and reflecting on the learning process.

Social system

The Herbartian model emphasizes the role of the teacher in classroom. Here the role of teacher is secondary and role of student is primary.

Support Learning

In support learning, all instructional aids adapted during teaching comes in support system.

Also Read : Intervention Model of Curriculum

Also Read : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., NET, Paper 2, Unit 7 Pedagogy, Andragogy and Assessment

Difference between Measurement and Evaluation

6 Comments

Measurement and evaluation are two related but distinct concepts that are often used in various fields, including education, psychology, and business. While they are similar in some ways, they differ in their goals, methods, and outcomes. Let’s explore the differences between measurement and evaluation in more detail.

Measurement

Measurement refers to the process of collecting data or information about a particular phenomenon, often using numerical values. The purpose of measurement is to quantify something so that it can be described or compared. For example, a teacher may measure the number of correct answers on a test to determine a student’s level of understanding of a particular subject. In this case, measurement involves collecting numerical data (the number of correct answers) and using that data to describe the student’s level of understanding.

Measurement can be direct or indirect. Direct measurement involves collecting data or information that is objective and observable, such as a person’s height or weight. Indirect measurement involves collecting data or information that is not directly observable, such as a person’s intelligence or personality traits. Indirect measurement often involves using proxies, such as standardized tests or surveys, to infer the underlying construct being measured.

Evaluation

Evaluation, on the other hand, involves making a judgment or determination about the value or quality of something based on collected data or information. It often involves comparing actual results against expected or desired outcomes or standards. For example, a manager may evaluate the effectiveness of a training program by comparing the performance of employees who completed the training to those who did not.

Evaluation involves making judgments about the effectiveness or value of a particular program, policy, or intervention. It can be formative, meaning they are conducted during the implementation of a program to identify strengths and weaknesses, or summative, meaning they are conducted after the implementation of a program to determine its overall effectiveness.

Key Differences

The key differences between measurement and evaluation can be summarized as follows:

  1. Purpose: The purpose of measurement is to collect data or information about a particular phenomenon in order to describe or compare it. The purpose of evaluation is to make a judgment or determination about the value or quality of something based on collected data or information.
  2. Focus: Measurement focuses on collecting data or information, often using numerical values, to describe or compare a particular phenomenon. Evaluation focuses on making judgments about the effectiveness or value of a particular program, policy, or intervention.
  3. Methods: Measurement involves collecting data or information using direct or indirect methods, while evaluation involves analyzing and interpreting data to make judgments or determinations.
  4. Outcomes: The outcome of measurement is a set of data or information that describes or compares a particular phenomenon. The outcome of evaluation is a judgment or determination about the value or quality of a particular program, policy, or intervention.

In summary, measurement and evaluation are related but distinct concepts that are often used together in various fields. While measurement involves collecting data or information about a particular phenomenon, evaluation involves making judgments or determinations about the effectiveness or value of a particular program, policy, or intervention based on that data or information.

Difference between Measurement and Evaluation
Difference between Measurement and Evaluation

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
B. Ed., Gender, School & Society

Gender Stereotyping

4 Comments

Gender stereotyping refers to the assignment of certain characteristics or attributes to individuals based on their gender.

These stereotypes are often based on societal norms and expectations surrounding gender roles and can be reinforced through various mediums, such as media, culture, and education.

Examples of Female Gender Stereotyping:

  • Women are expected to be nurturing and caring.
  • Women are supposed to be homemakers and take care of children.
  • Women should be interested in fashion, beauty, and other traditionally “feminine” things.
  • Women are often portrayed as passive and submissive in media and advertising.

Examples of Male Gender Stereotyping :

  • Men are expected to be tough and not show emotions.
  • Men are supposed to be the primary breadwinners in a household.
  • Men should be interested in sports, cars, and other “manly” things.
  • Men are often portrayed as aggressive and dominant in media and advertising.

Negative effect of Gender Stereotyping :

  1. Limits opportunities: Gender stereotyping can limit people’s opportunities . It discourage them from pursuing certain careers or interests that are seen as “not appropriate” for their gender. This can lead to missed opportunities for personal growth, career advancement, and societal progress.
  2. Reinforces inequality: Gender stereotyping reinforces the idea that certain genders are superior to others and reinforces gender inequality. This can lead to discrimination and unequal treatment based on gender, which can have negative effects on individuals and society.
  3. Lowers self-esteem: Gender stereotyping can lower the self-esteem of individuals who do not conform to traditional gender roles or expectations. This can lead to feelings of inadequacy, shame, and self-doubt.
  4. Negatively impacts mental health: Gender stereotyping can contribute to mental health issues, such as depression, anxiety, and stress. This is particularly true for individuals who face discrimination and bias due to their gender identity or expression.
  5. Hinders relationship building: Gender stereotyping can create barriers to building meaningful relationships between people of different genders. It can lead to misunderstandings, biases, and stereotypes that can hinder communication and connection.

Gender Stereotypes in India:

  1. Women are supposed to be homemakers: In India, there is a strong expectation that women should be responsible for managing the household and taking care of the family. This can limit women’s opportunities for education and career advancement, as well as perpetuate the idea that women’s primary role is to be a caregiver.
  2. Men are supposed to be breadwinners: Similarly, there is an expectation that men should be the primary breadwinners in the family. This can put pressure on men to provide for their families, often at the expense of their own well-being and personal fulfillment.
  3. Women are supposed to be modest: There is a belief in Indian culture that women should be modest and not draw attention to themselves. This can lead to victim-blaming in cases of sexual harassment or assault, as women are often blamed for “provoking” the attacker by their clothing or behavior.
  4. Women are supposed to be submissive: In Indian culture, women are often expected to be submissive and deferential to men. This can lead to power imbalances in relationships and perpetuate gender-based violence.
  5. Men are supposed to be strong and dominant: Men are often expected to be strong and dominant, and to display their masculinity through physical strength and aggression. This can lead to toxic masculinity and violence against women.

It is important to challenge and dismantle gender stereotypes to promote gender equality and create a more inclusive society where individuals are not limited by their gender.

This can involve creating policies and practices that support work-life balance for all genders, promoting diverse representations of gender roles in media and education, and encouraging individuals to challenge their own assumptions and biases about gender.

Also Read : Gender and Patriarchy

Gender Stereotyping

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!