Tag Archives: b ed second year

Whole Language approach to Language Teaching

The whole language approach is an educational philosophy and instructional method for teaching language and literacy skills. It gives the importance of language as a whole, including reading, writing, speaking, and listening, rather than focusing on individual skills in isolation or single-handedly.

The whole language approach emphasizes the importance of meaning in language learning. This means that language is learned through authentic experiences that are relevant and meaningful to the learner, such as reading and writing for real purposes, rather than isolated drills and exercises.

In the whole language approach, language is learned through meaningful and authentic experiences, such as reading and writing for real purposes, discussing and sharing ideas, and engaging in authentic communication.

The emphasis is on language as a tool for communication and expression, rather than simply as a set of skills to be mastered.

This approach focuses on the importance of creating a language-rich environment, both in the classroom and in the wider community. This includes exposure to a variety of texts, including literature, informational texts, and multimedia, as well as opportunities for students to engage in authentic writing experiences.

Critics of the whole language approach argue that it does not provide enough emphasis on basic skills, such as phonics and spelling, which are important for building a strong foundation in reading and writing. However, proponents of the approach argue that these skills can be learned naturally through exposure to language in meaningful contexts, without the need for isolated instruction.

Also Read: Peer Support program

The whole language approach to language teaching focuses on the process of language learning, rather than just the final product. This means that students are encouraged to take risks and make mistakes, as these are seen as a natural part of the learning process.

Whole Language Approach
Also Visit: Prep with Harshita

Bases of Curriculum

The term “bases of curriculum” refers to the fundamental principles, beliefs, and values that guide the design and implementation of educational programs and curricula. These may include:

  1. Philosophical basis: One of the contributing factors in determining the curriculum is are nature of knowledge, reality, and the purpose of education.
  2. Psychological basis: understanding of how students learn, motivation, and development because they will help in determining the curriculum.
  3. Sociological basis: Society plays a very important role in determining the future of a child so recognition of the impact of society, culture, and environment on education and learning will directly infer with the curriculum.
  4. Historical basis: It is important to consider past educational practices and their relevance to current and future educational needs.
  5. Political basis: awareness of the political, economic, and legal factors that influence education policy and practice can directly affect the curriculum.
Also Read: Factors influencing Curriculum Change

These bases provide the framework for creating an education program that is meaningful, relevant, and responsive to the needs of students and society. So they are called the bases of the curriculum as they will help in creating a proper structure.

Bases of Curriculum
Bases of Curriculum
Also Visit: Prep with Harshita

Emerging Problems Related to Knowledge

There are few problems related to knowledge and emerging trends:

  1. Misinformation and fake news: The rise of social media and the easy access to information is causing spread of misinformation and false information, making it difficult for people to differentiate between reliable and unreliable sources.
  2. Information overload: The increasing amount of information available has led to an overwhelming amount of information, making it difficult for people to process and retain knowledge.
  3. Decline in critical thinking: The ease of access to information has led to a decline in critical thinking skills, as people are more likely to accept information at face value without questioning its validity.
  4. Digital divide: Not everyone has equal access to technology and the internet, creating a digital divide that causes existing social and economic inequalities.
  5. False information has led to the spread of conspiracy theories, hoaxes, and other forms of false information, which can have serious consequences for individuals and society as a whole.

So these are few emerging problems related to knowledge.

Also Read: Factors Influencing Curriculum Change
Emerging Problem Related to Knowledge
Also Visit: Prep with Harshita

Difference Between Concrete and Absolute Knowledge

Concrete knowledge is the knowledge that is based on specific, observable facts and experiences, while absolute knowledge is the knowledge that is considered to be universal and unchanging, independent of individual perspectives or experiences.

Concrete is often more empirical and can be proven through observation and experimentation whereas absolute knowledge is often more philosophical and may not be able to be proven in the same way.

Concrete knowledge refers to knowledge of specific facts, events, and things. It is the knowledge that can be verified and proven to be true or false through empirical evidence and observation. It is also known as empirical knowledge or a posteriori knowledge.

Absolute knowledge refers to knowledge that is considered to be true and certain without the need for any further justification or proof. It is often associated with philosophical and religious beliefs and is considered to be a priori knowledge, which is the knowledge that is known independently of experience.

In summary, concrete knowledge is based on evidence and experience, while absolute knowledge is based on belief and cannot be verified through observation or experimentation.

Also Read: Contextual and Textual Knowledge
Difference between Contextual and textual knowledge
Also Visit: Prep with Harshita

Local vs Universal Knowledge

Local knowledge is the knowledge that is specific to a particular place, region, or culture. Local Knowledge includes traditional practices, beliefs, values, customs, and ways of life that have been developed and passed down over time within a particular community. Local knowledge is mostly practical in nature and closely related to the local environment, including the natural and human-made systems that support life in that area.

Local knowledge is specific to a particular place or culture, while universal knowledge is recognized as having value and validity across different regions and cultures.

Universal knowledge refers to knowledge that is not tied to any particular place or culture and is recognized as having value and validity across different regions and cultures. Universal knowledge typically includes scientific principles, mathematical concepts, and other forms of knowledge that are considered to be true and unchanging regardless of where they are studied. Universal knowledge is the result of proper scientific and systematic study and research which is considered to be objective and impartial.

Universal knowledge is considered to be true, valid, and relevant in all cultures and communities. It is based on scientific principles and evidence which is considered to be applicable and relevant in all societies and cultures. Universal knowledge is often acquired through formal education and is validated through research and experimentation.

Also Read: Contextual and Textual Knowledge
Local vs Universal Knowledge
Also Visit: Prep with Harshita