Tag Archives: Assessment of Learning

Approaches of Assessment, Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., M. Ed., NET, Paper 2, Unit 6 Research in Education

Meaning and Types of Reliability

Leave a comment

Reliability is an important criterion of a good test/tool. Reliability refers to consistency. A test that shows a consistent result in its frequent uses in different
situations and places is called the reliability of the test. The other synonyms that can be used for getting the reliability of the test are dependability, stability, consistency, predictability, accuracy, etc. It implies that the reliable test always provides a stable, dependable, accurate, and consistent result in its subsequent uses.

Meaning and Types of Reliability

Test-retest reliability:

  • Test-retest reliability means the same test is administered twice on the same group of samples within a given time interval and correlation is calculated between the two sets of scores (first and second administration). If the coefficient of correlation is positive and high, it is considered that the test is reliable. Let us discuss the procedures of using test-retest reliability.

Limitations of using the method:

  • As the same test is administered twice on the same group, there will be the threat of carry-over effect, which means, during the second administration, the candidates may remember many items from the first administration.
  • The scoring of the second administration is usually high than the first one.
  • Maintaining a gap of time between the test and re-test is also again one of the important aspects of determining the exact value of reliability. If the time gap is very less, then the carry-over effect will be high and on the other side, if the time gap is very high, the maturity effects of the candidates may hamper the test results.
  • This method is not free from errors. Memory, carryover, practice, and maturity effects are high in this technique.

Parallel-Form Reliability :

Because of the error factors in the test-retest method, the parallel-form method is one of the alternate methods of the test-retest method and it can minimize many of the errors that occurred in the earlier method. In the parallel form method, two parallel tests are prepared keeping in consideration equivalence in all aspects such as similarities in content, objectives, types, and number of items, the time allowed in both the tests, level of difficulty, discrimination value, conditions of use, etc.

Limitation of parallel form method :

The parallel form method is also not completely free from errors. There are possibilities of making errors in this method also:

  • Practice and carry-over effect is not totally minimized, as both the tests are equivalent in nature in many respects except only the items are different and a time interval of 15 days to 6 months is given for testing the second form of the test. During this period, there is a chance that 29 Criteria of a Good Tool the students may practice similar content and items, and hence chances for getting better scores in the second test are generally more.
  • Preparing two parallel forms of tests is also a complex task.
  • This method is comparatively time taking to get reliability.

Internal consistency reliability :

Internal consistency reliability indicates the homogeneity of the test. If all the items of the test measure the same function or trait, the test is said to be a homogeneous one and its internal consistency reliability would be pretty high. The most common method of estimating internal consistency reliability is the

(a) Split-half method
(b) Rational equivalence method.

Also Read: Characteristics of a Good Research Tool

Also Visit: Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Approaches of Assessment, Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., M. Ed.

Assessment As Learning

Leave a comment

Assessment as learning is a type of formative assessment that focuses on engaging students in the assessment process to help them develop their metacognitive skills and become self-directed learners. In assessment as learning, students take an active role in evaluating their own learning progress and reflecting on their understanding of the subject matter.

Features of Assessment as Learning :

  1. Student-centered: Assessment as learning is a student-centered approach to assessment. It involves students in the process of assessing their own learning progress and understanding of the subject matter.
  2. Formative: Assessment as learning is a formative assessment approach. This means that it provides ongoing feedback to students to help them improve their understanding of the subject matter. The feedback is designed to guide students towards deeper learning and help them identify areas where they need to focus their attention.
  3. Self-assessment: Assessment as learning involves self-assessment by students. Self-assessment helps students to reflect on their learning progress, identify areas where they need to improve, and take responsibility for their own learning.
  4. Feedback: Assessment as learning emphasizes the importance of feedback. The feedback provided to students should be timely, specific, and focused on helping them improve their understanding of the subject matter. Feedback can be provided by teachers, peers, or even the students themselves.
  5. Metacognitive skills: Assessment as learning focuses on developing students’ metacognitive skills. Metacognition refers to the ability to think about one’s own thinking. It involves planning, monitoring, and evaluating one’s own learning. Assessment as learning helps students to develop these skills and become more self-directed learners.
  6. Rubrics: Assessment as learning often uses rubrics. A rubric is a set of criteria for evaluating student performance. Rubrics provide clear guidelines for what is expected of students and help them to understand how they will be evaluated.
  7. Collaboration: Assessment as learning promotes collaboration among students. Students work together to evaluate each other’s learning progress, provide feedback, and support each other’s learning.

Overall, assessment as learning is an effective approach to assessment that helps students to become more self-directed learners. By involving students in the assessment process and focusing on developing their metacognitive skills, assessment as learning helps students to take responsibility for their own learning, deepen their understanding of the subject matter, and become more effective learners.

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

Assessment as Learning
BUY ME A BOOK!
Approaches of Assessment, Assessment for Learning, B. Ed., M. Ed.

Assessment of Learning

Leave a comment

Assessment of learning is the process of measuring and evaluating a student’s knowledge, understanding, and skills in a particular subject area. It is an essential component of education and is used to determine whether students have met the learning objectives of a course or program.

Features of Assessment of Learning :

  • Assessment of learning can take many forms, including exams, tests, essays, projects, presentations, and assignments. Each type of assessment has its advantages and disadvantages, and the selection of the assessment method depends on the learning objectives, the nature of the subject, and the desired outcomes.
  • It takes place at the end of a learning activity or course and is designed to evaluate the student’s understanding and knowledge level. It is often used for grading and certification purposes. Examples of this include final exams, standardized tests, and term papers.
  • Its purpose is to measure and evaluate the student’s knowledge and understanding of the subject matter against a set of predetermined criteria.
  • These assessments are usually administered after the learning activity has been completed and are designed to evaluate the overall achievement of the student.
  • The primary objective of this is to provide an overall evaluation of a student’s performance in a specific area. They are often graded on a numerical scale or letter grade and used to determine a student’s final grade in a course or to certify that a student has met the learning objectives of a program.
  • They are typically more formal than formative assessments and are usually administered under controlled conditions. They are designed to be objective, reliable, and consistent, ensuring that all students are evaluated using the same criteria.

While assessment of learning are an important component of the education system, they have some limitations. For example, they do not provide immediate feedback to students, and students may feel anxious or stressed when taking these assessments. Additionally, They may not reflect a student’s full understanding of a subject, as they only assess the knowledge and skills that have been explicitly taught.

Overall, assessment of learning is an essential component of education and is used to measure the effectiveness of teaching, evaluate student performance, and provide feedback for improvement. By using a variety of assessment methods, educators can ensure that students are evaluated fairly and that they have the opportunity to demonstrate their full understanding of a subject.

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

Assessment of Learning

Also Read : Meaning and Need of Assessment

BUY ME A BOOK!