Tag Archives: m.ed notes

B. Ed., Childhood and Growing Up, M. Ed., Psychology of Learning and Development

Socio Cultural Theory of Vygotsky

2 Comments

Socio-cultural theory of Vygotsky emphasizes the important role that culture and social interactions play in the development of cognitive abilities. According to Vygotsky, human development occurs through a process of internalizing cultural tools and practices, such as language and symbols, which allow individuals to think and reason at higher levels. This process of internalization occurs through social interactions with more knowledgeable individuals and is facilitated through the use of mediational tools, such as language, which serve to bridge the gap between an individual’s current level of development and their potential for future development. In this way, Vygotsky’s theory highlights the interdependence of social and individual development, and the importance of cultural and historical context in shaping cognitive abilities.

Features of Socio Cultural theory of Vygotsky

  1. Zone of Proximal Development: The difference between what a child can do independently and what they can do with help from others. This concept highlights the importance of social interaction and guidance in cognitive development.
  2. Scaffolding: The support and guidance provided by more knowledgeable individuals during the learning process, which helps a child progress to the next level of development.
  3. Internalization: The process of taking external cultural tools, such as language, and making them one’s own, thereby transforming them into internal mental processes.
  4. Social Interaction: Vygotsky believed that social interaction is crucial for cognitive development, as individuals learn through their interactions with others.
  5. Cultural Historical Context: Vygotsky emphasized that cognitive development is shaped by the historical and cultural context in which individuals live.
  6. Mediation: The use of cultural tools and practices, such as language, symbols, and artifacts, to mediate and transform cognitive processes.
  7. Collaborative Learning: Vygotsky saw learning as a collaborative process, in which individuals work together to negotiate meaning and construct knowledge.

Also Visit : Difference between Growth and Development

Socio Cultural theory of Vygotsky

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Psychology of Learning and Development

Gagne’ Hierarchical Theory of Learning

5 Comments

Gagne’s Hierarchical theory of learning is a psychological theory of learning and instruction that was proposed by Robert Gagne in the mid-20th century. It suggests that learning occurs in a series of stages or steps, with each step building on the previous one. The theory proposes that there are five main stages in the learning process:

  1. Stimulus: The learner is presented with a stimulus that captures their attention.
  2. Response: The learner responds to the stimulus in some way.
  3. Feedback: The learner receives feedback on their response, which can either reinforce or modify their behavior.
  4. Retention: The learner retains the information or skill learned, either in their short-term or long-term memory.
  5. Transfer: The learner applies what they have learned in new and different situations.

Gagne’s Hierarchical theory of learning also recognizes the importance of specific mental processes, such as perception, discrimination, and recall, in the learning process. The theory suggests that these processes can be improved through instructional methods such as verbal information, demonstration, and practice.

Overall, Gagne’s Hierarchical theory of learning is a comprehensive theory that emphasizes the importance of the instructional process in facilitating learning and improving performance. The theory has been widely used in the field of education and continues to influence the design of instructional materials and programs.

Features of Gagne’s Hierarchical theory of learning :

  1. Hierarchical organization: Gagne’s theory is organized in a hierarchical manner, with each level building upon the previous one. The nine events of instruction form a progression that begins with gaining the learner’s attention and ends with evaluating learning outcomes.
  2. Matching instruction to outcome: The theory stresses the importance of matching instructional strategies to the type of learning outcome desired. Different instructional strategies are used for cognitive, motor, or verbal skills.
  3. Prior learning experiences: The theory acknowledges that prior learning experiences can influence the effectiveness of instruction.
  4. Transfer of learning: Gagne’s theory recognizes that learners can apply knowledge and skills learned in one situation to new and different situations.
  5. Motivation and attitudes: The theory takes into account the role of motivation and attitudes in the learning process.
  6. Feedback: Gagne’s theory emphasizes the importance of providing feedback to learners to support ongoing improvement and mastery of the material.
  7. Clear and effective instructional design: The theory calls for instructional design that is clear, well-organized, and effective in meeting the learner’s needs.
Gagne Hierarchical Theory of Learning

BUY ME A BOOK!
M. Ed., Psychology of Learning and Development

Hull Derive Reduction Theory of Learning

6 Comments

The Hull reduction theory of learning refers to the psychological theory proposed by Clark Hull in the 1930s and 1940s. It suggests that behavior is the result of a combination of drives, habits, and motives that are motivated by a need for reward or satisfaction. The theory proposes that learning occurs through a process of trial and error and reinforcement, and that behavior is shaped by the consequences of our actions.

According to Hull’s theory, the strength of a drive, habit, or motive is determined by its associated reinforcement value, which is in turn based on the subjective value of the reward or satisfaction obtained from the behavior. The theory also suggests that behavior is influenced by the individual’s history of reinforcement, with the frequency and timing of rewards affecting the strength of the drive, habit, or motive.

Hull’s reduction theory of learning is one of the early learning theory in psychology and remains an important influence in the field, particularly in the area of motivation and reinforcement.

Also Visit My YouTube Channel : Prep With Harshita

Features of Hull Reduction Theory of Learning :
  1. Drive reduction: Hull’s theory proposes that behavior is motivated by drives, which are based on physiological needs such as hunger, thirst, and the need for sleep. The theory suggests that the strength of a drive increases with deprivation and decreases with satisfaction.
  2. Reinforcement value: The reinforcement value of a behavior is the subjective value of the reward or satisfaction obtained from the behavior. Hull’s theory suggests that the strength of a drive, habit, or motive is determined by its associated reinforcement value.
  3. Habit strength: Hull’s theory proposes that habits are formed through repeated behavior and reinforcement, and that the strength of a habit increases with repetition and reinforcement.
  4. Stimulus-response relationships: Hull’s theory suggests that behavior is determined by the strength of the drive, habit, or motive, as well as the individual’s response tendencies and the properties of the stimulus.
  5. Trial-and-error learning: Hull’s theory suggests that learning occurs through a process of trial and error and reinforcement, with behavior being shaped by the consequences of our actions.
  6. Drive-reducing stimuli: Hull’s theory proposes that drive-reducing stimuli, such as food or water, have a higher reinforcement value than other stimuli and are more likely to elicit a drive-reducing response.
  7. Drive-increasing stimuli: Hull’s theory suggests that drive-increasing stimuli, such as hunger or thirst, increase the strength of a drive and increase the likelihood of a drive-reducing response.

These features of Hull’s reduction theory of learning highlight its focus on the role of reinforcement and drive in shaping behavior and its emphasis on the interaction between physiological needs and reinforcement in the learning process.

Also Read : Kothari Commission

Hull Derive Reduction Theory of Learning

BUY ME A BOOK!
Curriculum Planning and Development, M. Ed.

System Analysis Model of Curriculum

4 Comments

System Analysis Model is used to improve and evaluate the present system of curriculum. A curriculum system analysis model is a framework used to evaluate and improve the curriculum development process in educational institutions.

It examines the various components of the curriculum, such as goals and objectives, content, instructional materials, assessment, and evaluation, which help to identify strengths and weaknesses and suggest improvements in the current system of curriculum.

The aim of this model is to ensure that the curriculum aligns with the needs of students and supports their learning and development in the right direction. The analysis process may involve collecting and analyzing data from various sources, such as teachers, students, and experts, and using it to make decisions about curriculum design and implementation.

The features of a system analysis model for curriculum development include:

  1. Assessment of goals and objectives- It ensure if the goals and objectives are with respect to the need of the students.
  2. Content analysis: The model examines the relevance and accuracy of the content covered in the curriculum, and identifies any gaps.
  3. Instructional materials review: The model evaluates the quality and effectiveness of instructional materials, such as textbooks and technology, used in the curriculum.
  4. Assessment and evaluation: The model assesses the validity and reliability of the assessment and evaluation methods used to measure student learning and progress.
  5. Stakeholder engagement: The model encourages active involvement of key stakeholders, such as teachers, students, parents, and experts, in the curriculum development process.
  6. Data-driven decision making: The model uses data collected from various sources to inform decisions about curriculum design and implementation.
  7. Continuous improvement: The model provides a framework for ongoing evaluation and improvement of the curriculum, to ensure that it remains relevant and effective with changing needs and expectations.
System Analysis Model of Curriculum Development
BUY ME A BOOK!
Curriculum Planning and Development, Curriculum Studies, M. Ed.

Grass Root Model of Curriculum

7 Comments

The grass-roots model of curriculum refers to an approach in which the design, development, and implementation of the educational curriculum are driven by the needs, experiences, and perspectives of teachers, students, and other stakeholders who are directly involved with the use of curriculum. This is a bottom up approach. This model is characterized by a decentralized approach, in which decision-making authority is distributed among different stakeholders. The goal of the grass-roots model is to create a curriculum that is relevant, meaningful, and according to the needs of the community, rather than being imposed from above.

Hilda Taba’s model is based on grass root approach. The model emphasizes a collaborative and democratic approach to curriculum development that involves all stakeholders, including teachers, students, administrators, and community members.

Key features of this model include:
  1. Community involvement: This model involves the active participation of community members in determining the educational needs and goals of the local area.
  2. Decentralization: The grass root model emphasizes decentralized decision making, with more power being given to local schools and communities to determine their own curricular needs and the power is not in a single hand.
  3. Relevance to need : The curriculum is developed with a focus on addressing the specific needs and challenges of the local community, making it more relevant and useful for students.
  4. Cultural sensitivity: The grass root model takes into account the cultural and linguistic background of the local community, ensuring that the curriculum is inclusive and culturally sensitive.
  5. Flexibility: This model allows for flexibility in the implementation of the curriculum, taking into account the unique needs and resources of each community.

Also Read : Tyler Model

Grass Root model of Curriculum Development

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!