Tag Archives: prep with harshita curriculum

Advance Curriculum theory ( Secondary level)

Major characteristics of Curriculum Theory- Conceptual Structure

Leave a comment

The conceptual structure of curriculum theory includes the following major characteristics:

  1. Curriculum as a social construct: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a socially constructed structure that is shaped by the values, beliefs, and relations of society. It recognizes that curriculum is not a neutral organization or structure but is influenced by social and cultural contexts.
  2. Curriculum as a process: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a dynamic and ongoing process that involves the design, implementation, and evaluation of educational programs. It recognizes that curriculum is not a fixed entity but is constantly evolving and changing in response to new knowledge, social and cultural changes, and educational policies.
  3. Curriculum as a context for learning: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a context for learning, in which learners engage in meaningful and purposeful activities that promote their intellectual, social, and emotional development. It recognizes that curriculum is not just a collection of knowledge and skills but is a means for promoting the holistic development of learners.
  4. Curriculum as a tool for social change: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a tool for social change, in which educators can use the curriculum to promote social justice, equity, and democracy. It recognizes that curriculum can be used to challenge social inequalities and to promote the empowerment of learners.
  5. Curriculum as a reflection of values and beliefs: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a reflection of the values and beliefs that underlie education. It recognizes that curriculum is not value-free but is shaped by the beliefs and values of educators, learners, and society.
Major Characteristics of Curriculum Theory- Conceptual Structure
BUY ME A BOOK!
Advance Curriculum theory ( Secondary level)

The Implication of Piaget’s and Bruner’s Views on Curriculum Development

2 Comments

Both Piaget and Bruner made significant contributions to the field of education and their views have implications for curriculum development.

Piaget’s theory of cognitive development suggests that children construct knowledge through their experiences and that this construction of knowledge is an active process. Piaget argued that children go through four stages of development and that the curriculum should be designed to meet the needs of children at each stage of development. For example, at the preoperational stage, children are not yet able to think logically, so the curriculum should be designed to help them learn through hands-on experiences and concrete examples.

Bruner’s theory of cognitive development focuses on the role of language and culture in shaping a child’s development. Bruner argued that children learn best when they are actively engaged in the learning process and that the curriculum should be designed to help children make connections between what they already know and what they are learning. Bruner also emphasized the importance of scaffolding, which involves providing children with support as they learn new concepts.

Both Piaget’s and Bruner’s views on curriculum development emphasize the importance of designing the curriculum to meet the needs of the child. Both theorists suggest that children should be active participants in the learning process and that the curriculum should be designed to help them construct knowledge through their experiences. In addition, both theorists emphasize the importance of providing children with support as they learn new concepts, whether through scaffolding or through hands-on experiences. Overall, the implications of their views on curriculum development emphasize the importance of creating a curriculum that is developmentally appropriate, engaging, and meaningful for children.

Also Read : Types of Evaluation

The implication of Piaget’s and Bruner’s Views on Curriculum Development

Also Visit : Prep with Harshita

BUY ME A BOOK!
Curriculum Planning and Development, M. Ed.

System Analysis Model of Curriculum

Leave a comment

System Analysis Model is used to improve and evaluate the present system of curriculum. A curriculum system analysis model is a framework used to evaluate and improve the curriculum development process in educational institutions.

It examines the various components of the curriculum, such as goals and objectives, content, instructional materials, assessment, and evaluation, which help to identify strengths and weaknesses and suggest improvements in the current system of curriculum.

The aim of this model is to ensure that the curriculum aligns with the needs of students and supports their learning and development in the right direction. The analysis process may involve collecting and analyzing data from various sources, such as teachers, students, and experts, and using it to make decisions about curriculum design and implementation.

The features of a system analysis model for curriculum development include:

  1. Assessment of goals and objectives- It ensure if the goals and objectives are with respect to the need of the students.
  2. Content analysis: The model examines the relevance and accuracy of the content covered in the curriculum, and identifies any gaps.
  3. Instructional materials review: The model evaluates the quality and effectiveness of instructional materials, such as textbooks and technology, used in the curriculum.
  4. Assessment and evaluation: The model assesses the validity and reliability of the assessment and evaluation methods used to measure student learning and progress.
  5. Stakeholder engagement: The model encourages active involvement of key stakeholders, such as teachers, students, parents, and experts, in the curriculum development process.
  6. Data-driven decision making: The model uses data collected from various sources to inform decisions about curriculum design and implementation.
  7. Continuous improvement: The model provides a framework for ongoing evaluation and improvement of the curriculum, to ensure that it remains relevant and effective with changing needs and expectations.
System Analysis Model of Curriculum Development
BUY ME A BOOK!