Tag Archives: prep with harshita mdu

Curriculum as Product

2 March 2023 Harshita Jain 1 Comment

In the context of curriculum as product and education, the curriculum can be viewed as a product. A curriculum can be seen as a designed and packaged set of educational experiences, learning goals, and materials that are delivered to students in a specific sequence or order.

The product perspective of curriculum views it as a pre-determined set of educational goals and objectives, organized into a structured program or course of study.

The product perspective of the curriculum is often associated with a top-down, centralized approach to education, where decisions about what should be taught, how it should be taught, and how it should be assessed are made by curriculum designers and policymakers. This approach has been criticized for being too focused on outcomes and not taking into account the diversity of students’ backgrounds, interests, and learning styles.

Overall, the product perspective of the curriculum emphasizes the importance of defining clear learning outcomes, creating effective instructional materials, and assessing students’ progress toward meeting those outcomes. However, it should be complemented with other perspectives, such as the learner-centered and socio-cultural perspectives, to ensure that education is tailored to the needs and interests of all students.

The product perspective of curriculum sees it as a set of planned and organized educational experiences that are designed to achieve specific learning outcomes. Some of the key features of the curriculum as a product perspective include:

Standardization : It is designed to be standardized across different classrooms, schools, and districts. This approach aims to ensure that all students are exposed to the same content and skills, regardless of their location or background.
Learning objectives: The approach places a strong emphasis on defining clear learning objectives and outcomes. These objectives serve as the basis for developing instructional materials, assessments, and evaluations.
Structured content: This approach typically involves a structured sequence of content and skills that students are expected to master. This sequence is often predetermined and follows a logical progression that builds on previous knowledge and skills.
Assessment: The requires a systematic and standardized approach to assessing students’ progress toward meeting learning objectives. This may involve standardized tests, exams, or other forms of assessment.
Instructional materials: This approach emphasizes the development of high-quality instructional materials, such as textbooks, workbooks, and other resources. These materials are designed to support teachers in delivering the curriculum and ensuring that students meet the learning objectives.

Difference between Contextual and Textual Knowledge

2 March 2023 Harshita Jain 6 Comments

Contextual knowledge and textual knowledge are two types of knowledge that are important in understanding the information.

Textual knowledge refers to knowledge that is specifically stated or written down in text or language. It can include definitions, facts, theories, and other information that can be found in textbooks, articles, and other written materials.

On the other hand, contextual knowledge refers to the knowledge that is derived from the context or situation in which information is presented. It involves understanding the meaning and significance of information based on the broader context in which it is presented, including the social, cultural, historical, and personal factors that influence how information is interpreted.

For example, if someone reads the sentence “She wore a black dress to the funeral,” the textual knowledge would be the words themselves and their literal meaning. However, the contextual knowledge would involve understanding the cultural and social significance of wearing black to a funeral, as well as any personal or emotional factors that may be involved in the situation.

In summary, textual knowledge involves understanding the literal meaning of words and information, while contextual knowledge involves understanding the broader context in which information is presented and interpreted. Both types of knowledge are important in understanding and interpreting information accurately.

Major characteristics of Curriculum Theory- Conceptual Structure

1 March 2023 Harshita Jain Leave a comment

The conceptual structure of curriculum theory includes the following major characteristics:

Curriculum as a social construct: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a socially constructed structure that is shaped by the values, beliefs, and relations of society. It recognizes that curriculum is not a neutral organization or structure but is influenced by social and cultural contexts.
Curriculum as a process: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a dynamic and ongoing process that involves the design, implementation, and evaluation of educational programs. It recognizes that curriculum is not a fixed entity but is constantly evolving and changing in response to new knowledge, social and cultural changes, and educational policies.
Curriculum as a context for learning: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a context for learning, in which learners engage in meaningful and purposeful activities that promote their intellectual, social, and emotional development. It recognizes that curriculum is not just a collection of knowledge and skills but is a means for promoting the holistic development of learners.
Curriculum as a tool for social change: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a tool for social change, in which educators can use the curriculum to promote social justice, equity, and democracy. It recognizes that curriculum can be used to challenge social inequalities and to promote the empowerment of learners.
Curriculum as a reflection of values and beliefs: Curriculum theory views curriculum as a reflection of the values and beliefs that underlie education. It recognizes that curriculum is not value-free but is shaped by the beliefs and values of educators, learners, and society.

Major Characteristics of Curriculum Theory- Conceptual Structure

BUY ME A BOOK!

Advance Curriculum theory ( Secondary level)

The Implication of Piaget’s and Bruner’s Views on Curriculum Development

1 March 2023 Harshita Jain 2 Comments

Both Piaget and Bruner made significant contributions to the field of education and their views have implications for curriculum development.

Piaget’s theory of cognitive development suggests that children construct knowledge through their experiences and that this construction of knowledge is an active process. Piaget argued that children go through four stages of development and that the curriculum should be designed to meet the needs of children at each stage of development. For example, at the preoperational stage, children are not yet able to think logically, so the curriculum should be designed to help them learn through hands-on experiences and concrete examples.

Bruner’s theory of cognitive development focuses on the role of language and culture in shaping a child’s development. Bruner argued that children learn best when they are actively engaged in the learning process and that the curriculum should be designed to help children make connections between what they already know and what they are learning. Bruner also emphasized the importance of scaffolding, which involves providing children with support as they learn new concepts.

Both Piaget’s and Bruner’s views on curriculum development emphasize the importance of designing the curriculum to meet the needs of the child. Both theorists suggest that children should be active participants in the learning process and that the curriculum should be designed to help them construct knowledge through their experiences. In addition, both theorists emphasize the importance of providing children with support as they learn new concepts, whether through scaffolding or through hands-on experiences. Overall, the implications of their views on curriculum development emphasize the importance of creating a curriculum that is developmentally appropriate, engaging, and meaningful for children.

Need Assessment Model of Curriculum